Deal Analysis
Worksheet · Author: Austin Coon
Screening rules exist to save you time. The 1% rule, its aggressive cousin the 2% rule, and the expense-side 50% rule are triage tools: each one kills weak deals in minutes so your real underwriting time goes to the survivors.
Used properly they rank deals within a market. Used improperly — as pass/fail verdicts — they reject nearly everything in Indianapolis, where most single-family homes trade at 0.6–0.9% rent-to-price.
The 1% rule’s blind spot is everything it ignores: taxes, insurance, HOA, condition, and your interest rate. The fix is to layer real carrying costs on top of the ratio — county taxes, insurance, a 5% vacancy allowance, a maintenance reserve, and actual financing. The ratio gets you to the table; the cash flow line tells you whether to sit down.
What ratio should I target in Indianapolis?
0.8% or better with positive cash flow after honest expenses is a reasonable bar for a full underwrite. In appreciation areas like Carmel and Fishers, lower ratios can make sense when your thesis is growth rather than monthly income.
Is the 50% rule reliable?
As a screen, yes; as an underwrite, no. Real expense ratios run from about 35% on newer construction to 60%+ on older homes with owner-paid utilities. Use it to catch wild underestimates, then do the real math.
Where do I go after the screen?
Graduate promising deals to the Rental Underwriting Model for cash-on-cash and cap rate, and the Simple Pro Forma calculator on this site for the quick version.